BulletProof Nerds Gaming Community
May 25, 2012, 04:12:10 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: TO POST ON THE FORUMS YOU MUST REGISTER ON THE BPN HOMEPAGE, ONCE YOU ARE LOGGED IN THERE, IT AUTOMATICALLY LOGS YOU INTO THE FORUMS AS WELL.  IF YOU STILL CAN'T POST THEN LOG OUT OF THE WEBSITE AND LOG BACK IN, THEN COME BACK TO THE FORUMS.
 
   Home   Help BPN HOMEPAGE Search Login Register  
Pages: 1   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: AMD's Zacate APU Performance Update  (Read 176 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
FEED
VIP
500 POSTS CLUB!
*

BPN Props: 0
Offline Offline

Posts: 665



Awards
« on: September 15, 2010, 06:10:03 AM »

AMD's Zacate APU Performance Update
   


 
   It’s 12:43AM and I just got back into my hotel room. I spent the past few hours in AMD’s suite a block from IDF trying to get to the bottom of an issue we discovered in our post on AMD’s Zacate GPU performance numbers earlier this week.

   Let’s recap. Zacate is AMD’s 18W APU aimed at the mainstream notebook market (~$500 notebooks). The APU features a pair of Bobcat cores and a Cedar-class AMD DX11 GPU. Spending some time with the physical Zacate package, it seems to have a single 64-bit DDR3 memory interface ala Atom. Unlike Atom however, both the Bobcat cores and the DX11 GPU should be relatively high performance.

   Earlier this week, AMD showed us the first public demonstration of Zacate. In its suite were two systems: a Zacate test platform and a Core i5-M 520 notebook from a major OEM. Both systems were configured with 4GB of memory and were running the 64-bit version of Windows 7 Premium.

   
   AMD's Zacate

   The first demo we saw on Monday was the system running City of Heroes. In CoH Zacate managed to reach frame rates around 2x of what we saw on the Core i5-M 520. AMD also ran through a number of IE9 performance tests including the Psychadelic HTML5 benchmark and the Amazon Shelf test. In both of those tests, the Zacate platform was significantly faster than the Core i5-M 520. And it was those IE9 tests that seemed suspect.

   
   The Zacate test platform

   I didn’t think much of it at first, but Zacate managed a ~10x performance advantage in the IE9 Psychadelic benchmark. While Zacate should have a higher performance GPU, it shouldn’t be that much faster. Something was amiss.

   I borrowed a Core i5 notebook from Intel (we are at IDF after all) and ran the same tests on it. The performance was much better than what I saw in AMD’s suite. I went back to AMD to find out exactly what was going on.

   

http://www.anandtech.com/show/3933/amds-zacate-apu-performance-update
    
Pages: 1   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  


Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2011, Simple Machines Page created in 0.33 seconds with 21 queries.